Non Syndromic Form of Bilateral Bimaxillary Bull Teeth- A Case Report with Challenges in Pediatric Dentistry

Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Centre (GARD),National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Orphanet, Europeanrare diseases database considers enlarged pulp chambers withroot dilacerations in primary teeth as a rare disease.Witkop defined bull teeth or taurodontism as teeth with largepulpchambers in which the bifurcation or trifurcation aredisplaced apically and hence the chamber has greater apicooclusalheight than normal teeth and lacks cervical constrictionat CEJ. Bull teeth was first described in 1908 by Gorjanovic-Kramberger in a 70,000 year old pre-Neanderthal fossil,discovered in Kaprina, Croatia. Bull teeth were a frequentfinding in early humans and is most common today in Eskimos,possibly as a selective adaptation for cutting hide. The term‘taurodontism’ was however first stated by Sir Arthur Keithin 1913. The origin of this term is from Greek “tauros” whichmeans “Bull” and “adontos” which means “Tooth”. Theorigin of the word taurodont is from a combination of Latin and

 Greek giving the meaning of Bull tooth. Bull teeth is seen withhighest frequency in eskimos as reported in the literature.It has also been reported in hybrids of Australoids, the Bushpeople of South Africa



 Turkish population showedprevalence of 22.8%, whereas Indian population showedprevalence of bull teeth in mandibular primary first molars to be0.4% . Most commonly affected teeth are molars followedby premolars in the permanent dentition, while primary molarsare commonly affected in the primary dentition but bimaxillarybilateral incidence is very rare as in our case. Multiple theorieshave been proposed to suggest a possible etiology. One theorystates that failure of Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath diaphragmto invaginate at the normal level results in short roots andenlarged pup chamber

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Harvesting Free Palatal Masticatory Mucosal Graft Using 3a Mucotome

Image
The technique of free autogenous gingival grafting (FGG) has undergone little modification since its introduction by Bjorn in Scandinavia in 1963 and by King and Pennel inthe United States in 1964. The technique is widely used to treat a variety of mucogingival problems such as insufficient or lack of attached gingiva, the presence of high frenum attachments, shallow fornix and denuded roots following gingival recession.  FGG can be procured from donor site using scalpels, gingivectomy knife or palatal shaving knife (Paquette knife). The donor site is frequently the palate, although the use of edentulous ridge areas, tuberosity and attached gingiva has also been described. Scalpel is most commonly used and conventional method for procuring gingival auto grafts. Gingivectomy knife, although not commonly used, also works on similar principle. Since the scalpel blade is straight and stiff and the palate is curved, repeated incisions to release the graft from underlying connecti
Read more

Dental Ailments may be risky for Cardiac Patients

Image
Patients that are suffering from cardiac t=disorders are susceptible to physical and mental stress. Dental ailments add to the stress further as these patients are unable to cope with the pain due to cardiac disorders. These patients may encounter medical emergencies in case of dental disorders and they may demand multi disciplinary approach to achieve the success. Additionally, the results of cardiac surgery may suffer if the oral cavity is not maintained well since there is always a fear of infection affecting the heart from the oral cavity. Hence, the cardiac surgeon has to refer surgical patients to a dentist for oral prophylaxis and to treat any oral infections before cardiac surgery to prevent infective endocarditis. PDF LINK
Read more

Non-Instrumented Silver Point Retreatment Using the GentleWave Procedure

Image
Apicoectomies are required for endodontically treated teeth instead of the preferred non-surgical endodontic therapy when biological or technical factors necessitate this therapy. These biological or technical factors may include, but are not limited to, non-healing periapical lesions, persistent clinical symptoms, separated instruments or silver points and the presence of long posts. Success rates for apicoectomies have been reported up to 78% with as many as 4% of endodontically treated teeth requiring this type of surgery. Although success rates are relatively high, once the tooth is no longer a candidate for non-surgical endodontic treatment, the alternatives in lieu of apicoectomy are limited to extraction with no replacement or replacement with a fixed prosthesis, removable prosthesis or implant. Read More>>>>>>>
Read more